Global Warming Again 

Global Warming Again

OK, I know this gets monotonous.

I'm not a scientist, but I'm always glad to see an intelligent argument that says either: global warming isn't that bad, or there is nothing cost-effective we can do about it.

(One major argument in Bjorn Lomborg's The Sceptical Environmentalist (recently vindicated by the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DSCD)) was that the major annual report on global warming (IPCC?) used to include a cost/benefit analysis--by far the most useful section for decision-makers. Then...they stopped including it. See Lomborg's exchange with Tom Burke.)

Here goes Ron Bailey on Hit and Run again.

But wait, didn't some Pentagon report recently confirm the worst predictions of global warming, combined with the need of drastic governmental actions? What does this mean?

I don't know. As I recall, the head of the Pentagon committee is about 80 years old. Maybe they need mandatory retirement.